What do you see in this symbol?
Of course is the main instrument that rules current word and its economies, our lives are directly affected being impacted negatively or positively by its existence.
We need it because it gives stability to our lives, it makes us happy allowing us to buy food and items, it can even buy fake love.
We can go out living in the streets if we don't have it.
But what truly is it showing? What is this symbol represents?
It is the mythological sign of primordial sin...
The disobedience from truth and God. The sin we all committed every day!
The sin that gets us away of God by making us loving everything that is material. And the king of all currencies...
Look at this ..
The new $100 bill predicts the end of the world..
http://www.worldstarhiphop.com/videos/video.php?v=wshhX2102dwQAs962NHO
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Cxi4GTtN9k
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQN-39sedcc
Monday, December 30, 2013
What makes enemies of Islam?
This post developed from another one in the Middle East forum (gee imagine that). That thread had a portion of it diverging from ME politics to the religious aspects of Islam. But it never seemed to be major enough to split off. I started venting and that lead to organization and rewriting.
I know that many will attack this as hate speech and me as a racist but that is not the case. However, I see much dishonesty in Islam’s representatives. Making that observation does not make me a bigot. Attacking me is just is the typical weak Muslim defense and is an indication of the dishonesty of the Ummah. The first lie is to say that Islam is the Religion of Peace. Although, if what I have presented here is true then perhaps I’d be foolish not to hate Islam.
As it is, I have no reason to hate but I am critical of the religion. So let’s leave that attack at the door.
I welcome anyone to prove me wrong in a non violent manner provided that Islam is indeed the Religion of Peace.
But the thing is is that I don’t think anyone can...
This is the core of Muslim belief...
Saying that the enemies of Islam (or non believers) are ignorant is establishing a core belief of Islam. That non believers are inferior and being inferior are targeted to be mocked, deceived and lied to.
3:110 – “You are the best nation ever to be produced before mankind. You enjoin the right, forbid the wrong and believe in Allah. If the People of the Book were to believe, it would be better for them. Some of them are believers...”
People of the Book then, are also inferior *AND* have corrupted the scripture. On a side note that since the Renaissance, Christendom and Islam have been going in the opposite directions. It’s clear that today, no Muslim nation can be considered close to even one of the best produced before mankind.
5:13 – “So for their breaking of the covenant We cursed them and made their hearts hard. They distort words from their [proper] usages and have forgotten a portion of that of which they were reminded. And you will still observe deceit among them, except a few of them. But pardon them and overlook [their misdeeds]. Indeed, Allah loves the doers of good.”
It’s quite easy to pardon them while beating them into submission.
So the first question is what makes enemies of Islam? Or what threatens the Ummah? Sin threatens the Ummah; something that goes against Muslim sensibilities. Anything that brings sin amongst the Ummah then threatens it, whether it may be unintentional in a peaceful pilgrimage or all the way up to a violent invasion. And of course, some things are subjective as to what constitutes a threat, although there could never be any confusion when it comes to the major sins. And the next question is how do non believers become enemies of Islam? The answer then is that they are already enemies of Islam (their existence creates mischief through the land) and not to obey Muslims or to convert (emigrate) keeps them enemies. By not emigrating, the non believer remains in sin. That is very straight forward. There is no confusion here. That shows the ultimate of hatred and intolerance (xenophobia) toward non Muslims.
When Muslim and non believer mix, can only bring the beginnings of Muslims straying from Islamic dogma. It encourages the Muslim to think differently, to think for themselves. Most in the West will ask what’s wrong with that?
From a pro Islamic website (http://www.islam44.n...s-in-islam.html) lists 10 major sins in Islam. I will not argue that some could modify this list, there are something like 70 sins overall. But the first one seems to always be at the top of any list you look at.
1) Shirk
2) To not call kafir, a kafir
3) Blasphemy
4) Renouncing Islam (Apostasy)
5) Innovation (Bida)
6) Rejection of hadith
7) Murder
8) Suspicions
9) Lies and back biting
10) Jadu-magic
Of these top ten, let’s look at several.
1) Shirk (ascribing partners with Allah).
In short, this would be the equivalent of making Jesus, Buddha, or even Brahma equal to Allah. The rest of the world would accept this, except for Islam. Ideally, this would occur [in Muslim nations] when the non Muslim population gets more than say 10%. At that point the non Muslim faith reaches a critical mass that would start influencing the laws and attitudes of the Muslims away from Allah. That threatens the Ummah. This is what Muslims do in other non Muslim nations. By the time the local Muslim community reaches 5% or 6%, they start making major demands in changing the laws and culture instead of absorbing into their new culture. They start demanding that Sharia Law is brought into the land. That is intolerant and shows disrespect to the new host nation. The only reason to do that is a precursor to invasion and conquest. Invasion and conquest does not need to start with air strikes. If these nations had the same laws as in Islam then the Muslim troublemakers would be put to death.
4:116 – “Indeed, Allah does not forgive association with Him, but He forgives what is less than that for whom He wills. And he who associates others with Allah has certainly gone far astray.”
5:72 – “… Indeed, he who associates others with Allah - Allah has forbidden him Paradise, and his refuge is the Fire. And there are not for the wrongdoers any helpers.”
Close to Shirk is Idolatry. When the Taliban took control in Afghanistan, they destroyed the Buddhas of Bamiyan. That was a crime against humanity. The US Supreme Court building has a frieze in the main chamber honoring 18 law givers from history. One is Mohammed, putting Islam on an equal footing with the others, especially Mosses and Jesus. If Muslims ever conquer the US, this will be one of the first buildings torn down, not only because of Shirk but also of Idolatry.
16:36 (mc) – “And We certainly sent into every nation a messenger, [saying], "Worship Allah and avoid Taghut. …"”
2) To not call kafir, a kafir.
First off, yes Kafir is a very derogatory reference. The language of Islam is dualistic. As an example, there is never any reference to humanity as a unified whole. Instead there is a division into the Ummah and kafir (non believer). Humanity is not seen as one body, but is divided into whether the person believes Mohammed is the prophet of Allah or not (dar al-Islam vs dar al-Harb). This sets up a legal situation in the Quran of how Muslims are to treat Muslims (represented by peaceful ayahs) and how Muslims are to treat non Muslims (represented by violent ayahs). This is also how Muslims confuse non Muslims because non Muslims think in terms of the whole of humanity.
40:35 (mc) – “Those who dispute concerning the signs of Allah without an authority having come to them - great is hatred [of them] in the sight of Allah and in the sight of those who have believed. Thus does Allah seal over every heart [belonging to] an arrogant tyrant.”
83:34 (mc) – “So Today those who believed are laughing at the disbelievers,”
25:77 (mc) – “Say, "What would my Lord care for you if not for your supplication?" For you [disbelievers] have denied, so your denial is going to be adherent.”
5:33 – “Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption (mischief through the land) is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world; and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment,”
3:28 – “Let not believers take disbelievers as allies rather than believers. And whoever [of you] does that has nothing with Allah , except when taking precaution against them in prudence. And Allah warns you of Himself, and to Allah is the [final] destination.”
And of course:
9:29 – “Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.”
All throughout the Quran, it states that the non believer is inferior and deserves ridicule and death in this life and the next. How anyone can say that that is misinterpreting the scripture has never presented a logical reason why this is wrong. Any such argument usually leads to Muslims retreating into a defense mode. This action reveals that there is something to the claim and that they can’t put up a defense.
4) Renouncing Islam (Apostasy).
16:106 (mc) –“Whoever disbelieves in Allah after his belief... except for one who is forced [to renounce his religion] while his heart is secure in faith. But those who [willingly] open their breasts to disbelief, upon them is wrath from Allah , and for them is a great punishment;”
4:89 – “They wish you would disbelieve as they disbelieved so you would be alike. So do not take from among them allies until they emigrate for the cause of Allah . But if they turn away, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them and take not from among them any ally or helper.”
The first ayah is ambiguous enough to claim this is punishment in the afterlife. But it does introduce the concepts of Taqiya and Kitman. Taqiya is basically to lie about your faith and Kitman is to pay lip service to the local non Muslim authority; both techniques Muslims will try to use to discredit this treatise. The second one clearly states punishment in this life. What’s also interesting is that Allah forced them to disbelieve and then ordered their deaths. For a clearer picture, I have this current incident that happened a few years ago, that helps explain the Muslim mindset.
In 2007, Sheikh Ali Gomaa, the Grand Mufti of Egypt, stated In regard to a Muslim’s right to renounce Islam and to join another (apostasy), his initial rulings sounded lenient. The Washington Post-Newsweek forum in English was one of the forums that published his decisions. BTW, he is Sunni (Shafi’i).
“The essential question before us is: Can a person who is a Muslim choose a religion other than Islam? The answer is yes, they can, because the Quran says, ‘Unto you your religion, and unto me my religion,’ (Quran 109:6mc) and, ‘Whosoever will, let him believe, and whosever will, let him disbelieve,’ (Quran18:29mc) and, ‘There is no compulsion in religion. The right direction is distinct from error’ (Quran 2:256).”
He added, “These verses from the Quran discuss a freedom that God affords all people. But from a religious prospective, the act of abandoning one’s religion is a sin punishable by God on the Day of Judgment. If the case in Question is one of merely rejecting faith, then there is no worldly punishment.” He went on to state, “If, however, the crime of undermining the foundations of the society is added to the sin of apostasy, then the case must be referred to a judicial system whose role is to protect the integrity of the society…..According to Islam, it is not permitted for Muslims to reject their faith, so if a Muslim were to leave Islam and adopt another religion, they would thereby be committing a sin in the eyes of Islam. Religious belief and practice is a personal matter, and society only intervenes when that personal matter becomes public and threatens the well-being of its members.”
A few days later, the Grand Mufti, issued another statement. This time he was speaking in Arabic in Cairo and what he said was completely different: “What I actually said was that Islam prohibits a Muslim from changing his religion and it’s a crime that must be punished.”
One of the first things to notice is that 2:256 never defines what is meant by “The right direction is distinct” to the non believer – what is the right direction? The non believer will insert their own understanding here and that is the desired affect because now, the rest of his message is hidden. The next part of his statement is double talk. “A freedom that God affords all people” does sound inviting but when you consider that Allah allows non believers (when he isn’t forcing them not to) to reject the true faith are condemned. And then states that “But from a religious prospective…” that at least Muslims are not afforded this freedom. But because most non believers do not understand the hierarchy Muslims put on humanity, it sounds perfectly intuitive to them. The next part, he distinguishes “merely rejecting faith” from “the sin of apostasy”. This plays on the sensibilities of the non believer. Knowing that in Islam there are situations where one can publicly reject the faith but it’s not what the non believer understands that to mean. The sin of apostasy is a threat to the foundation of the Ummah; the Muslim society is in danger and must be defended. It cannot allow even just one to leave the faith. And that will usually lead condemnation in a “Muslim” judicial system and probably put to death. In Christianity, people are free to come and go within the faith. Or more precisely, the culture. There are no more witch hunts for non believers.
5) Innovation. (Bida).
In this context, Bida Sayyiah refers to adding something that changes the meaning in the Quran in a meaningful way (detrimental). It is the opposite of Hasanah. As an example of Hasanah, this is equivalent in how to deal with life going into space or using a nuclear bomb to kill non believers since these things were not originally mentioned in the Quran. Sayyiah is where you do something like try to reform the concept of Shirk or accept Apostasy.
2:170,171 – “ And when it is said to them, "Follow what Allah has revealed," they say, "Rather, we will follow that which we found our fathers doing." Even though their fathers understood nothing, nor were they guided? - The example of those who disbelieve is like that of one who shouts at what hears nothing but calls and cries cattle or sheep - deaf, dumb and blind, so they do not understand.”
5:3 – “This day those who disbelieve have despaired of [defeating] your religion; so fear them not, but fear Me. This day I have perfected for you your religion and completed My favor upon you and have approved for you Islam as religion.”
"Whoever innovates into this affair of ours something that we have not commanded it is to be rejected" - Al-Bukhari and Al-Muslim.
This means that there is no possible way for Islam to reform to the modern age. It must remain stuck in time. No enlightenment. Therefore the faith will remain violent.
The Christian Church did go through the Reformation after the schism caused by Martin Luther that divided the Church between Catholic and Protestant. Both sides thought the other were heretics (Bida Sayyiah). There was a lot of violence in the name of GOD and eventually unofficially ended with the Peace of Westphalia. Each side (grudgingly in some cases) basically accepted the other. And began a period where conversion at sword point and inquisitions would begin to dwindle. Vatican II and not condemning Jews for the death of Christ was an eventual outcome of Westphalia. The Christian Church did indeed reform and it continues to do so. Reform is a sign of maturity.
There has been no *Peace of Westphalia* for Sunni and Shiite has there? The Christian Reform took on a growing of faith and enlightenment. Today, the faith challenges itself in popular culture. When Andres Serrano exhibited his “p*** Christ”, it caused riots for some but for the majority, it was an awakening. Kevin Smith released the movie “Dogma” which was an attack on the Church but it didn’t cause it to collapse. It allowed us to laugh at ourselves and to look retrospectively into our own faith and pull strength from it. And that has allowed a change in mindset in the body of Christ all the way up to the last few Popes albeit slowly. Dan Brown released the “Da Vinci Code” and the interest in lost scripture and ideas has wetted our curiosity in an attempt to learn more about Jesus. Surely, several hundred years ago such persons would have been burned at the stake for heresy, but no longer. We find that questioning our faith strengthens the faith, it doesn’t endanger it.
It can’t happen in Islam because too many Muslims would end up being as critical as I am. That would completely destroy the Ummah. Some do as in Salman Rushdie writing “The Satanic Verses” and he has to fear for his life under a fatwa. Let’s not forget the Jyllands-Posten Mohammed cartoons. Yes, Islam is far from being reformed. People are hungry to seek the truth and Islam is not it. It doesn’t have to be that way if Islam can reform. The Ummah doesn’t have to dissolve.
7) Murder.
4:93 – “But whoever kills a believer intentionally - his recompense is Hell, wherein he will abide eternally, and Allah has become angry with him and has cursed him and has prepared for him a great punishment.”
5:32 – “Because of that, We decreed upon the Children of Israel that whoever kills a soul unless for a soul or for corruption [done] in the land (spreading mischief in the land) - it is as if he had slain mankind entirely. And whoever saves one - it is as if he had saved mankind entirely. And our messengers had certainly come to them with clear proofs. Then indeed many of them, [even] after that, throughout the land, were transgressors.”
Many times it is just expressed as “One who kills an innocent has killed the whole of humanity.” For one thing, why is there a need to reinforce “Thou shall not kill” among Jews? That is already part of their credo. Therefore it must mean something else. Here, we see a dualistic meaning. It says “killing a soul” which implies a Muslim. There doesn’t seem to be a restriction of a Muslim killing a Jew or a non believer. Here Mankind refers to the Ummah.
There is Murder and there is Killing. The taking of a [innocent] life of a believer is Murder. The taking of a life of a non believer is just killing. Even non believer children are not innocent. The term used a lot is “Killing a Human Being” when referring to Murder (of a Muslim). The North American Indians had the same concept. An Indian was considered a Human Being, but the White Man was considered to have no soul. It was perfectly acceptable to kill a White Man. Although, it could be a delicate matter as killing one in the open could bring more. But in Islam I doesn’t seem to matter.
9:5 – “And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakah, let them [go] on their way. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.”
So basically, this is saying that after a treaty has terminated with the non believer (for whatever reason) and the waiting period of 4 months has passed, then Muslims are free to attack. Muslims are free to kill the non believer in order to dominate and subjugate.
Here are the words of Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja of Algiers in 1786, when Thomas Jefferson asked him why Muslims held so much hostility towards America, a nation with which they had no previous contacts and Adja had answered that “Islam was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Quran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman (Muslim) who should be slain in Battle was sure to go to Paradise."
This was very honest because no one would have guessed that the US would be able to stand up for themselves and successfully fight back. Shortly after that the beginning of the end of the Ottoman Empire was under way. However, this explanation and the explanation that Bin Laden gives in his Letter to America (http://www.theguardi.../24/theobserver), separated by over 200 years is the same. It’s the same as it was 1400 years ago. Bin laden asks us two questions: (Q1) Why are we fighting and opposing you? & (Q2)What are we calling you to, and what do we want from you?. It doesn’t take long to understand that Q1 is more or less excuses and BS. Q2 is the pertinent question and the reason that Bin Laden attacked us, because the Quran gives him the right to kill non believers. Bin Laden was an extremist. Someone like Anjem Choudary is a moderate and his message is basically the same.
In 2010, Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, stated that he was going to build a Muslim cultural center in the shadow of the WTC footprint. He said that he wanted to build a bridge between Christian and Muslim faiths. Actually, that wasn’t a bad idea because Muslims had died there too. However, his true intentions became known when he wanted to call it Cordoba House, which to most people means nothing but in Islamic history it is the site of a major victory. Mosques are built on the site of great Muslim victories. This insensitivity to American sensibilities damaged his credibility but has shown what is in the minds of even moderate Muslims.
The Conquest of Andalucía was an expansion of the Umayyad Empire in 711ce. After the fall of Cordoba the population still outnumbered the Muslim conquerors. The Cathedral of Cordoba (the greatest in Europe at the time) was the icon of Christianity but that couldn’t stand for long as no Muslim can allow other authority to be equal to Allah. So they took over half of the Cathedral and turned it into a mosque. In time, the Christian population slowly diminished and the Umayyad rulers forced the sale of the other half. Christians were allowed to rebuild minor churches but they had become subordinate to Islam (as it is in Muslim countries today). This is how Islam spreads. In 732, the Battle of Tours, lead by Charles Martel stopped the Muslim encroachment of Europe and started the reclaiming of Andalucía and by 1492, la Reconquista established Spain as a nation by removing the last vestment of Muslim rule in Granada. The loss of al Andalus 500 years later still resonates in the Muslim world. And is the reason that Islam feels threatened.
So there might be many that will be furious with this and that is fine. The truth hurts. What is desired is not your expression of how insulted you are. But if you think this is wrong then provide evidence. I’ve already have laid out what does not constitute evidence. If this was the Christian faith, many would say that I am absolutely right. But then Christianity doesn’t try to hide its intentions....
.jpg)
I know that many will attack this as hate speech and me as a racist but that is not the case. However, I see much dishonesty in Islam’s representatives. Making that observation does not make me a bigot. Attacking me is just is the typical weak Muslim defense and is an indication of the dishonesty of the Ummah. The first lie is to say that Islam is the Religion of Peace. Although, if what I have presented here is true then perhaps I’d be foolish not to hate Islam.
As it is, I have no reason to hate but I am critical of the religion. So let’s leave that attack at the door.
I welcome anyone to prove me wrong in a non violent manner provided that Islam is indeed the Religion of Peace.
But the thing is is that I don’t think anyone can...
This is the core of Muslim belief...
Saying that the enemies of Islam (or non believers) are ignorant is establishing a core belief of Islam. That non believers are inferior and being inferior are targeted to be mocked, deceived and lied to.
3:110 – “You are the best nation ever to be produced before mankind. You enjoin the right, forbid the wrong and believe in Allah. If the People of the Book were to believe, it would be better for them. Some of them are believers...”
People of the Book then, are also inferior *AND* have corrupted the scripture. On a side note that since the Renaissance, Christendom and Islam have been going in the opposite directions. It’s clear that today, no Muslim nation can be considered close to even one of the best produced before mankind.
5:13 – “So for their breaking of the covenant We cursed them and made their hearts hard. They distort words from their [proper] usages and have forgotten a portion of that of which they were reminded. And you will still observe deceit among them, except a few of them. But pardon them and overlook [their misdeeds]. Indeed, Allah loves the doers of good.”
It’s quite easy to pardon them while beating them into submission.
So the first question is what makes enemies of Islam? Or what threatens the Ummah? Sin threatens the Ummah; something that goes against Muslim sensibilities. Anything that brings sin amongst the Ummah then threatens it, whether it may be unintentional in a peaceful pilgrimage or all the way up to a violent invasion. And of course, some things are subjective as to what constitutes a threat, although there could never be any confusion when it comes to the major sins. And the next question is how do non believers become enemies of Islam? The answer then is that they are already enemies of Islam (their existence creates mischief through the land) and not to obey Muslims or to convert (emigrate) keeps them enemies. By not emigrating, the non believer remains in sin. That is very straight forward. There is no confusion here. That shows the ultimate of hatred and intolerance (xenophobia) toward non Muslims.
When Muslim and non believer mix, can only bring the beginnings of Muslims straying from Islamic dogma. It encourages the Muslim to think differently, to think for themselves. Most in the West will ask what’s wrong with that?
From a pro Islamic website (http://www.islam44.n...s-in-islam.html) lists 10 major sins in Islam. I will not argue that some could modify this list, there are something like 70 sins overall. But the first one seems to always be at the top of any list you look at.
1) Shirk
2) To not call kafir, a kafir
3) Blasphemy
4) Renouncing Islam (Apostasy)
5) Innovation (Bida)
6) Rejection of hadith
7) Murder
8) Suspicions
9) Lies and back biting
10) Jadu-magic
Of these top ten, let’s look at several.
1) Shirk (ascribing partners with Allah).
In short, this would be the equivalent of making Jesus, Buddha, or even Brahma equal to Allah. The rest of the world would accept this, except for Islam. Ideally, this would occur [in Muslim nations] when the non Muslim population gets more than say 10%. At that point the non Muslim faith reaches a critical mass that would start influencing the laws and attitudes of the Muslims away from Allah. That threatens the Ummah. This is what Muslims do in other non Muslim nations. By the time the local Muslim community reaches 5% or 6%, they start making major demands in changing the laws and culture instead of absorbing into their new culture. They start demanding that Sharia Law is brought into the land. That is intolerant and shows disrespect to the new host nation. The only reason to do that is a precursor to invasion and conquest. Invasion and conquest does not need to start with air strikes. If these nations had the same laws as in Islam then the Muslim troublemakers would be put to death.
4:116 – “Indeed, Allah does not forgive association with Him, but He forgives what is less than that for whom He wills. And he who associates others with Allah has certainly gone far astray.”
5:72 – “… Indeed, he who associates others with Allah - Allah has forbidden him Paradise, and his refuge is the Fire. And there are not for the wrongdoers any helpers.”
Close to Shirk is Idolatry. When the Taliban took control in Afghanistan, they destroyed the Buddhas of Bamiyan. That was a crime against humanity. The US Supreme Court building has a frieze in the main chamber honoring 18 law givers from history. One is Mohammed, putting Islam on an equal footing with the others, especially Mosses and Jesus. If Muslims ever conquer the US, this will be one of the first buildings torn down, not only because of Shirk but also of Idolatry.
16:36 (mc) – “And We certainly sent into every nation a messenger, [saying], "Worship Allah and avoid Taghut. …"”
2) To not call kafir, a kafir.
First off, yes Kafir is a very derogatory reference. The language of Islam is dualistic. As an example, there is never any reference to humanity as a unified whole. Instead there is a division into the Ummah and kafir (non believer). Humanity is not seen as one body, but is divided into whether the person believes Mohammed is the prophet of Allah or not (dar al-Islam vs dar al-Harb). This sets up a legal situation in the Quran of how Muslims are to treat Muslims (represented by peaceful ayahs) and how Muslims are to treat non Muslims (represented by violent ayahs). This is also how Muslims confuse non Muslims because non Muslims think in terms of the whole of humanity.
40:35 (mc) – “Those who dispute concerning the signs of Allah without an authority having come to them - great is hatred [of them] in the sight of Allah and in the sight of those who have believed. Thus does Allah seal over every heart [belonging to] an arrogant tyrant.”
83:34 (mc) – “So Today those who believed are laughing at the disbelievers,”
25:77 (mc) – “Say, "What would my Lord care for you if not for your supplication?" For you [disbelievers] have denied, so your denial is going to be adherent.”
5:33 – “Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption (mischief through the land) is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world; and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment,”
3:28 – “Let not believers take disbelievers as allies rather than believers. And whoever [of you] does that has nothing with Allah , except when taking precaution against them in prudence. And Allah warns you of Himself, and to Allah is the [final] destination.”
And of course:
9:29 – “Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.”
All throughout the Quran, it states that the non believer is inferior and deserves ridicule and death in this life and the next. How anyone can say that that is misinterpreting the scripture has never presented a logical reason why this is wrong. Any such argument usually leads to Muslims retreating into a defense mode. This action reveals that there is something to the claim and that they can’t put up a defense.
4) Renouncing Islam (Apostasy).
16:106 (mc) –“Whoever disbelieves in Allah after his belief... except for one who is forced [to renounce his religion] while his heart is secure in faith. But those who [willingly] open their breasts to disbelief, upon them is wrath from Allah , and for them is a great punishment;”
4:89 – “They wish you would disbelieve as they disbelieved so you would be alike. So do not take from among them allies until they emigrate for the cause of Allah . But if they turn away, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them and take not from among them any ally or helper.”
The first ayah is ambiguous enough to claim this is punishment in the afterlife. But it does introduce the concepts of Taqiya and Kitman. Taqiya is basically to lie about your faith and Kitman is to pay lip service to the local non Muslim authority; both techniques Muslims will try to use to discredit this treatise. The second one clearly states punishment in this life. What’s also interesting is that Allah forced them to disbelieve and then ordered their deaths. For a clearer picture, I have this current incident that happened a few years ago, that helps explain the Muslim mindset.
In 2007, Sheikh Ali Gomaa, the Grand Mufti of Egypt, stated In regard to a Muslim’s right to renounce Islam and to join another (apostasy), his initial rulings sounded lenient. The Washington Post-Newsweek forum in English was one of the forums that published his decisions. BTW, he is Sunni (Shafi’i).
“The essential question before us is: Can a person who is a Muslim choose a religion other than Islam? The answer is yes, they can, because the Quran says, ‘Unto you your religion, and unto me my religion,’ (Quran 109:6mc) and, ‘Whosoever will, let him believe, and whosever will, let him disbelieve,’ (Quran18:29mc) and, ‘There is no compulsion in religion. The right direction is distinct from error’ (Quran 2:256).”
He added, “These verses from the Quran discuss a freedom that God affords all people. But from a religious prospective, the act of abandoning one’s religion is a sin punishable by God on the Day of Judgment. If the case in Question is one of merely rejecting faith, then there is no worldly punishment.” He went on to state, “If, however, the crime of undermining the foundations of the society is added to the sin of apostasy, then the case must be referred to a judicial system whose role is to protect the integrity of the society…..According to Islam, it is not permitted for Muslims to reject their faith, so if a Muslim were to leave Islam and adopt another religion, they would thereby be committing a sin in the eyes of Islam. Religious belief and practice is a personal matter, and society only intervenes when that personal matter becomes public and threatens the well-being of its members.”
A few days later, the Grand Mufti, issued another statement. This time he was speaking in Arabic in Cairo and what he said was completely different: “What I actually said was that Islam prohibits a Muslim from changing his religion and it’s a crime that must be punished.”
One of the first things to notice is that 2:256 never defines what is meant by “The right direction is distinct” to the non believer – what is the right direction? The non believer will insert their own understanding here and that is the desired affect because now, the rest of his message is hidden. The next part of his statement is double talk. “A freedom that God affords all people” does sound inviting but when you consider that Allah allows non believers (when he isn’t forcing them not to) to reject the true faith are condemned. And then states that “But from a religious prospective…” that at least Muslims are not afforded this freedom. But because most non believers do not understand the hierarchy Muslims put on humanity, it sounds perfectly intuitive to them. The next part, he distinguishes “merely rejecting faith” from “the sin of apostasy”. This plays on the sensibilities of the non believer. Knowing that in Islam there are situations where one can publicly reject the faith but it’s not what the non believer understands that to mean. The sin of apostasy is a threat to the foundation of the Ummah; the Muslim society is in danger and must be defended. It cannot allow even just one to leave the faith. And that will usually lead condemnation in a “Muslim” judicial system and probably put to death. In Christianity, people are free to come and go within the faith. Or more precisely, the culture. There are no more witch hunts for non believers.
5) Innovation. (Bida).
In this context, Bida Sayyiah refers to adding something that changes the meaning in the Quran in a meaningful way (detrimental). It is the opposite of Hasanah. As an example of Hasanah, this is equivalent in how to deal with life going into space or using a nuclear bomb to kill non believers since these things were not originally mentioned in the Quran. Sayyiah is where you do something like try to reform the concept of Shirk or accept Apostasy.
2:170,171 – “ And when it is said to them, "Follow what Allah has revealed," they say, "Rather, we will follow that which we found our fathers doing." Even though their fathers understood nothing, nor were they guided? - The example of those who disbelieve is like that of one who shouts at what hears nothing but calls and cries cattle or sheep - deaf, dumb and blind, so they do not understand.”
5:3 – “This day those who disbelieve have despaired of [defeating] your religion; so fear them not, but fear Me. This day I have perfected for you your religion and completed My favor upon you and have approved for you Islam as religion.”
"Whoever innovates into this affair of ours something that we have not commanded it is to be rejected" - Al-Bukhari and Al-Muslim.
This means that there is no possible way for Islam to reform to the modern age. It must remain stuck in time. No enlightenment. Therefore the faith will remain violent.
The Christian Church did go through the Reformation after the schism caused by Martin Luther that divided the Church between Catholic and Protestant. Both sides thought the other were heretics (Bida Sayyiah). There was a lot of violence in the name of GOD and eventually unofficially ended with the Peace of Westphalia. Each side (grudgingly in some cases) basically accepted the other. And began a period where conversion at sword point and inquisitions would begin to dwindle. Vatican II and not condemning Jews for the death of Christ was an eventual outcome of Westphalia. The Christian Church did indeed reform and it continues to do so. Reform is a sign of maturity.
There has been no *Peace of Westphalia* for Sunni and Shiite has there? The Christian Reform took on a growing of faith and enlightenment. Today, the faith challenges itself in popular culture. When Andres Serrano exhibited his “p*** Christ”, it caused riots for some but for the majority, it was an awakening. Kevin Smith released the movie “Dogma” which was an attack on the Church but it didn’t cause it to collapse. It allowed us to laugh at ourselves and to look retrospectively into our own faith and pull strength from it. And that has allowed a change in mindset in the body of Christ all the way up to the last few Popes albeit slowly. Dan Brown released the “Da Vinci Code” and the interest in lost scripture and ideas has wetted our curiosity in an attempt to learn more about Jesus. Surely, several hundred years ago such persons would have been burned at the stake for heresy, but no longer. We find that questioning our faith strengthens the faith, it doesn’t endanger it.
It can’t happen in Islam because too many Muslims would end up being as critical as I am. That would completely destroy the Ummah. Some do as in Salman Rushdie writing “The Satanic Verses” and he has to fear for his life under a fatwa. Let’s not forget the Jyllands-Posten Mohammed cartoons. Yes, Islam is far from being reformed. People are hungry to seek the truth and Islam is not it. It doesn’t have to be that way if Islam can reform. The Ummah doesn’t have to dissolve.
7) Murder.
4:93 – “But whoever kills a believer intentionally - his recompense is Hell, wherein he will abide eternally, and Allah has become angry with him and has cursed him and has prepared for him a great punishment.”
5:32 – “Because of that, We decreed upon the Children of Israel that whoever kills a soul unless for a soul or for corruption [done] in the land (spreading mischief in the land) - it is as if he had slain mankind entirely. And whoever saves one - it is as if he had saved mankind entirely. And our messengers had certainly come to them with clear proofs. Then indeed many of them, [even] after that, throughout the land, were transgressors.”
Many times it is just expressed as “One who kills an innocent has killed the whole of humanity.” For one thing, why is there a need to reinforce “Thou shall not kill” among Jews? That is already part of their credo. Therefore it must mean something else. Here, we see a dualistic meaning. It says “killing a soul” which implies a Muslim. There doesn’t seem to be a restriction of a Muslim killing a Jew or a non believer. Here Mankind refers to the Ummah.
There is Murder and there is Killing. The taking of a [innocent] life of a believer is Murder. The taking of a life of a non believer is just killing. Even non believer children are not innocent. The term used a lot is “Killing a Human Being” when referring to Murder (of a Muslim). The North American Indians had the same concept. An Indian was considered a Human Being, but the White Man was considered to have no soul. It was perfectly acceptable to kill a White Man. Although, it could be a delicate matter as killing one in the open could bring more. But in Islam I doesn’t seem to matter.
9:5 – “And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakah, let them [go] on their way. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.”
So basically, this is saying that after a treaty has terminated with the non believer (for whatever reason) and the waiting period of 4 months has passed, then Muslims are free to attack. Muslims are free to kill the non believer in order to dominate and subjugate.
Here are the words of Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja of Algiers in 1786, when Thomas Jefferson asked him why Muslims held so much hostility towards America, a nation with which they had no previous contacts and Adja had answered that “Islam was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Quran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman (Muslim) who should be slain in Battle was sure to go to Paradise."
This was very honest because no one would have guessed that the US would be able to stand up for themselves and successfully fight back. Shortly after that the beginning of the end of the Ottoman Empire was under way. However, this explanation and the explanation that Bin Laden gives in his Letter to America (http://www.theguardi.../24/theobserver), separated by over 200 years is the same. It’s the same as it was 1400 years ago. Bin laden asks us two questions: (Q1) Why are we fighting and opposing you? & (Q2)What are we calling you to, and what do we want from you?. It doesn’t take long to understand that Q1 is more or less excuses and BS. Q2 is the pertinent question and the reason that Bin Laden attacked us, because the Quran gives him the right to kill non believers. Bin Laden was an extremist. Someone like Anjem Choudary is a moderate and his message is basically the same.
In 2010, Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, stated that he was going to build a Muslim cultural center in the shadow of the WTC footprint. He said that he wanted to build a bridge between Christian and Muslim faiths. Actually, that wasn’t a bad idea because Muslims had died there too. However, his true intentions became known when he wanted to call it Cordoba House, which to most people means nothing but in Islamic history it is the site of a major victory. Mosques are built on the site of great Muslim victories. This insensitivity to American sensibilities damaged his credibility but has shown what is in the minds of even moderate Muslims.
The Conquest of Andalucía was an expansion of the Umayyad Empire in 711ce. After the fall of Cordoba the population still outnumbered the Muslim conquerors. The Cathedral of Cordoba (the greatest in Europe at the time) was the icon of Christianity but that couldn’t stand for long as no Muslim can allow other authority to be equal to Allah. So they took over half of the Cathedral and turned it into a mosque. In time, the Christian population slowly diminished and the Umayyad rulers forced the sale of the other half. Christians were allowed to rebuild minor churches but they had become subordinate to Islam (as it is in Muslim countries today). This is how Islam spreads. In 732, the Battle of Tours, lead by Charles Martel stopped the Muslim encroachment of Europe and started the reclaiming of Andalucía and by 1492, la Reconquista established Spain as a nation by removing the last vestment of Muslim rule in Granada. The loss of al Andalus 500 years later still resonates in the Muslim world. And is the reason that Islam feels threatened.
So there might be many that will be furious with this and that is fine. The truth hurts. What is desired is not your expression of how insulted you are. But if you think this is wrong then provide evidence. I’ve already have laid out what does not constitute evidence. If this was the Christian faith, many would say that I am absolutely right. But then Christianity doesn’t try to hide its intentions....
.jpg)
Sunday, December 29, 2013
What aerosol scattering or chemtrails Really Are
Chemtrails (CTs) look like contrails initially, but are much thicker, extend across the sky and are often laid down in varying patterns of Xs,tick-tack-toe grids, cross-hatched and parallel lines. Instead of quickly dissipating, chemtrails expand and drip feathers and mare's tails. In 30 minutes or less, they open into wispy formations which join together,forming a thin white veil or a "fake cirrus-type cloud" that persists for hours.We are dealing with Star Wars.
It involves the combination of chemtrails for creating an atmosphere that will support electromagnetic waves, ground-based,electromagnetic field oscillators called gyrotrons, and ionospheric heaters.
Particulates make directed energy weapons work better. It has to do with "steady state" and particle density for plasma beam propagation. They spray barium powders and let it photo-ionize from the ultraviolet light of the sun.
Then, they make an aluminum-plasma generated by "zapping" the metal cations that are in the spray with either electromagnetics from HAARP, the gyrotron system on the ground [Ground Wave Emergency Network], or space-based lasers.
The barium makes the aluminum-plasma more particulate dense. This means they can make a denser plasma than they normally could from just ionizing the atmosphere or the air.
More density [more particles] means that these particles which are colliding into each other will become more charged because there are more of them present to collide.
What are they ultimately trying to do up there -- is create charged-particle, plasma beam weapons.
Chemtrails are the medium - GWEN pulse radars, the various HAARPs, and space-based lasers are the method, or more simply: Chemtrails are the medium -- directed energy is the method. Spray and Zap.
This system appears to be in Russia, Canada, the United States, and all of Europe. Exotic weapons can be mobile, stationary, land-based, aerial, or satellite. It is an offensive and defensive system against EM attacks and missiles. It uses ionospheric particle shells as defense mechanisms [like a bug-zapper shell]* against missiles and EM attacks.
That means they spray and then pump up the spray with electromagnetics.
The chemtrail sprays have various elements in them like carbon which can used to absorb microwaves. Some of these sprays have metal flakes in them that make aerial craft invisible to radar.
Sprays like these can be used to create colorful, magnetized plasmas to cloak fighter jets.
There are satellite weapons involved.
The technical names for vertical and horizontal plasma columns are columnar focal lenses and horizontal drift plasma antennas. Various size of gas plasma orbs are associated with this technology. These orbs can be used as transmitters and receivers because they have great, refractory and optical properties. They also are capable of transmitting digital or analog sound. Barium, in fact, is very refractive -- more refractive than glass.
What does that mean?
Someone or someones are very involved in unconstitutional, domestic spying and the entrained plasma orbs carried on electromagnetic beams can be used for mind control programming. The satellites can be programmed to track and monitor various frequencies on different parts of your body.
These electromagnetic beams carrying the gas plasma orbs stick due magnetic polarity and frequency mapping and tracking to people's eyes, ears, temples, and private parts.
A beam with entrained orbs carries pictures in each orb just like the different frames in a movie. It is a particle beam that is also a frequency weapon. The satellites download holographic mind control movies, pictures, sounds, and sensations to people through this technology. The Air Force has stated in "Air Force 2025" that their goal is to develop virtual and augmented reality mind control. Depending on the how the computer is programmed or depending on the mood or intent of the person interfacing with the technology, you can be probed, bothered, gaslighted, frightened, manipulated, electronically raped, or tortured.
It scans your brain frequencies and deciphers your thoughts. The satellites track you by mapping your bioenergetic signature [body biometrics] and constantly scanning an area to find you.
We are the lab rats for this technology and something is very wrong in the military or intelligence branches somewhere.
Because developmental projects in government and military are often so compartmentalized...
I suppose someone could be using and developing this technology secretly and without authorization. Then again, behavioral and mind control programs were an authorized policy under MKULTRA.
Our country has a history of experimenting on its citizens.
We are talking about satellite charged-particle frequency weapons attacking a person 24 hours a day. Psychotronic weapons are considered weapons of mass destruction by the U.N. "HAARPs" can create earthquakes and can also x-ray the earth to find underground military bases, gold, or oil reserves.
These ionospheric heaters can also operate as an over-the-horizon or under-the-ocean communications system.
This system can control the weather or create disasters.
Taken together with the aurora keyhole through-your-roof satellite surveillance system, Echelon electronic computer/phone sweeps, plasma-cloaked DOD Drug War helicopters and stealths, implants, and cameras on the street, it constitutes one, big global and space control grid.
These weapons involve beams. Two beams overlapped will couple into a particle-ion beam that will bounce off of a remote target and send a holographic image back to the satellite for remote spying operations. When you cross two strong beams, you can supposedly* create scalar energies.
These energies can be used as untraceable weapons for nuclear size explosions or for defense. These crossed-energies can be used to cause a person's physical electrical system to fail or with a lower frequency, administer a kind of remote electro-shock.
Visualize touching a positive and negative electric cable to each other on top of your head.
Scalar energies can be utilized in hand-held military guns and on tanks. They can dud-out electronics or cause large, electrical blackouts. Scalar energies are practically impossible to shield against.
You need lead, ceramics, and a deep underground facility to not be affected by these weapons.
Or, you need to be up and above the field of battle. People who are working on these issues hear tones and hums.
If you hear persistent tones and static; have body vibrations, burning sensations, "bangs" to the head, neurological damage, or immune system damage; are hearing electronic voices or hearing the sound of a plasma; suffering from pains deep in your organs or constant headaches; or experiencing other anomalous activity then you may be being targeted by directed energy, mind control weapons. These weapons could be on helicopters, jets, stealth fighters, or on satellites.
Directed energy beams and electromagnetic waves can be sent to you via hand-held devices or piggy-backed in on cell phone and satellite towers.
Is it possible that someone(s) are very afraid of coming famines and riots due to the ongoing, man-induced failure of the ecological system, and they are saturating the earth with chemtrails for large- scale, gas plasma mind control?
Is this the last grasp for the world's resources? Or, are they just control freaks and money mongers?
Someone would like to get to that oil under the melting [due to chemtrail-trapped EM heat] Artic. And, I guess the Third World is not a part of this system.
I don't think that the developed nations are going to let them in on this either.
Any country that joins this NATO system will become mind-controlled and diseased due to the associated, intense, oscillating, electromagnetic fields, electromagnetic soup, and the poisonous, toxic chemtrails. Our DNA will break.
We risk the earth's spin and tilt becoming messed up due to mucking around with the magnetic fields through this military technology. Maybe, it is already messed up.
It constitutes U.S. global domination via NATO and the erosion of civil rights. According to Charlotte Iserbyt and Al Martin, there are ex-KGB and ex-STASI advising our new Office of Total Information Awareness.
They are the ones creating our new internal passports [national ID]. And under "The Treaty on Open Skies," we have overflights by Russian and German military.
Who exactly is flying those plasma-cloaked craft that are seen all over this country and mistaken for UFOs by people who do not know about this aerial deception technology?
Obviously, we have another "Project Paperclip" in the making. We can add the new thugs to the 2,000 Iraqi brought into country by Daddy Bush who are now living in Nebraska.
The elitist corporate government is going to hold the rest of us hostage with directed energy weapons in space, if the Policy for a New American Century group - PNAC - Bush and cronie think tank has their way, along with directed energy attacks against any country or citizen that they decide they do not like.
These weapons can create climate war, weather war, mind war, cyber war, disease war, disaster war, and undetectable war.
Taken together they can create economic war. If this system is not stopped, it will kill billions due to aluminum and barium poisoning. It will kill billions due to crop failures and world-wide famine. It will cause heart attacks, strokes, and cancers. It will cause stillbirths, miscarriages, and infertility.
The chemtrail sprays often have fungi, bacteria, viruses, dessicated red blood cells, crystalline substances, carbon, metal cations, lithium, other chemicals, heavy metals, and God knows what - probably smart dust, or nanocrap.
Years of biowarfare testing on the American public is no big secret anymore.
Spraying germs in the sky where they mutate due to the ultra-violet light -- brillant plan, my man. Are we acceptable losses or is this by design? I know that many of the major players have big investments in pharmaceutical companies, GM seeds [seeds that can grow in an electromagnetic soup], weapons and directed energy development contracts, oil contracts, genetic research, and mind control research. Some of these people have had a familial history of financial and policy support for population control, eugenics, Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Lenin, Marx, Pinochet, Hussein, and various other dictators. Some of the major players were the masterminds of the death squads in Central and South America. They stand to make a big profit on our death and disease. Just take a look at Rumsfield and Tamiflu. I assume that they know the dangers of this system and that they take care to stay in their shielded, air-filtered offices, homes, bases, and cars. I assume they take chelating substances to remove the barium and aluminum from their bodies and minds. If not, then they really do not understand the far-ranging implications of this destructive system. Congress may not understand just what a terrible weapons system and control grid they are funding. As I understand it, Tesla towers attached to deep-earth, free-energy taps are to be created over the 10-12 magnetic poles and the GWEN system phased-out. Has this already been done? This should allow total control of the earth through giant, Tesla death ray-guns.
This natural, electromagnetic earth was not meant to be an un-natural dynamo to power man's weapons or his utility companies. Over-unity systems [Tesla devices]* are as of yet, another unexplored and probably not understood man-made energy. We should be very suspect of free energy.
As you can see, the forms of man-made energy that have been created and used in the past have not been good for this planet. Maybe it is time to reconsider the options available to us through the development of crops for fuel, wind, solar, and water power. We need world-wide, different, more holistic, renewable, energy programs. Is there any good news? Yes. There has been tons of particulate dumping through the spray operations for 8 years over the Americas, Europe, Scandinavia, Eastern Europe, and from what I can find out, over Russia. And, what goes around blows around, right? So, these substances are probably actually global. It sure makes a ton of sense to spray poisonous elements in 24 NATO countries and let the substances be carried around the earth on the jet streams to poison yourself, your enemies, and all neutral and non-combatent countries. Talk about making more enemies. The water, air, and soil of all of these countries is so saturated with metal cations that these weapons freaks should be able to zap and mind f--k each other quite well now and as often as they wish. Once they have clobbered each other with light-saber beams for a few years and razed and scorched sections of the earth, they may start to realize that this foreign policy will lead to a defective human race and a rotten economy.....
LAS VEGAS TRIBUNE LINKS MASS ILLNESS TO CHEMTRAILS
FINALLY... a serious article about chemtrails in a major city newspaper....
A quote from the Las Vegas Tribune Chemtrail article by Marcus K. Dalton:
"Especially disturbing for residents of heavily chemtrailed communities like Las Vegas is a "chemtrail sickness" associated with heavy spray days leaving many stricken people complaining of the "flu" and acute allergic reactions months after the flu season has ended.
Upper and lower respiratory and gastrointestinal ailments remain unusually high in many spray areas, along with debilitating fatigue - and something even more worrying.
What's going on?
He is convinced that we are under "deliberate biological attack" by agents known only to top military and government officials responsible for permitting continuing over-flights by unmarked spray aircraft."
Earth's atmosphere full of chemtrails and chem-haze, clearly visible in this recent sat image....
I wrote to the senate many times asking why they spray chemtrails and they respond back in denial ..that its only condensation ... They clearly lie about this ...why??
It involves the combination of chemtrails for creating an atmosphere that will support electromagnetic waves, ground-based,electromagnetic field oscillators called gyrotrons, and ionospheric heaters.
Particulates make directed energy weapons work better. It has to do with "steady state" and particle density for plasma beam propagation. They spray barium powders and let it photo-ionize from the ultraviolet light of the sun.
Then, they make an aluminum-plasma generated by "zapping" the metal cations that are in the spray with either electromagnetics from HAARP, the gyrotron system on the ground [Ground Wave Emergency Network], or space-based lasers.
The barium makes the aluminum-plasma more particulate dense. This means they can make a denser plasma than they normally could from just ionizing the atmosphere or the air.
More density [more particles] means that these particles which are colliding into each other will become more charged because there are more of them present to collide.
What are they ultimately trying to do up there -- is create charged-particle, plasma beam weapons.
Chemtrails are the medium - GWEN pulse radars, the various HAARPs, and space-based lasers are the method, or more simply: Chemtrails are the medium -- directed energy is the method. Spray and Zap.
This system appears to be in Russia, Canada, the United States, and all of Europe. Exotic weapons can be mobile, stationary, land-based, aerial, or satellite. It is an offensive and defensive system against EM attacks and missiles. It uses ionospheric particle shells as defense mechanisms [like a bug-zapper shell]* against missiles and EM attacks.
That means they spray and then pump up the spray with electromagnetics.
The chemtrail sprays have various elements in them like carbon which can used to absorb microwaves. Some of these sprays have metal flakes in them that make aerial craft invisible to radar.
Sprays like these can be used to create colorful, magnetized plasmas to cloak fighter jets.
There are satellite weapons involved.
The technical names for vertical and horizontal plasma columns are columnar focal lenses and horizontal drift plasma antennas. Various size of gas plasma orbs are associated with this technology. These orbs can be used as transmitters and receivers because they have great, refractory and optical properties. They also are capable of transmitting digital or analog sound. Barium, in fact, is very refractive -- more refractive than glass.
What does that mean?
Someone or someones are very involved in unconstitutional, domestic spying and the entrained plasma orbs carried on electromagnetic beams can be used for mind control programming. The satellites can be programmed to track and monitor various frequencies on different parts of your body.
These electromagnetic beams carrying the gas plasma orbs stick due magnetic polarity and frequency mapping and tracking to people's eyes, ears, temples, and private parts.
A beam with entrained orbs carries pictures in each orb just like the different frames in a movie. It is a particle beam that is also a frequency weapon. The satellites download holographic mind control movies, pictures, sounds, and sensations to people through this technology. The Air Force has stated in "Air Force 2025" that their goal is to develop virtual and augmented reality mind control. Depending on the how the computer is programmed or depending on the mood or intent of the person interfacing with the technology, you can be probed, bothered, gaslighted, frightened, manipulated, electronically raped, or tortured.
It scans your brain frequencies and deciphers your thoughts. The satellites track you by mapping your bioenergetic signature [body biometrics] and constantly scanning an area to find you.
We are the lab rats for this technology and something is very wrong in the military or intelligence branches somewhere.
Because developmental projects in government and military are often so compartmentalized...
I suppose someone could be using and developing this technology secretly and without authorization. Then again, behavioral and mind control programs were an authorized policy under MKULTRA.
Our country has a history of experimenting on its citizens.
We are talking about satellite charged-particle frequency weapons attacking a person 24 hours a day. Psychotronic weapons are considered weapons of mass destruction by the U.N. "HAARPs" can create earthquakes and can also x-ray the earth to find underground military bases, gold, or oil reserves.
These ionospheric heaters can also operate as an over-the-horizon or under-the-ocean communications system.
This system can control the weather or create disasters.
Taken together with the aurora keyhole through-your-roof satellite surveillance system, Echelon electronic computer/phone sweeps, plasma-cloaked DOD Drug War helicopters and stealths, implants, and cameras on the street, it constitutes one, big global and space control grid.
These weapons involve beams. Two beams overlapped will couple into a particle-ion beam that will bounce off of a remote target and send a holographic image back to the satellite for remote spying operations. When you cross two strong beams, you can supposedly* create scalar energies.
These energies can be used as untraceable weapons for nuclear size explosions or for defense. These crossed-energies can be used to cause a person's physical electrical system to fail or with a lower frequency, administer a kind of remote electro-shock.
Visualize touching a positive and negative electric cable to each other on top of your head.
Scalar energies can be utilized in hand-held military guns and on tanks. They can dud-out electronics or cause large, electrical blackouts. Scalar energies are practically impossible to shield against.
You need lead, ceramics, and a deep underground facility to not be affected by these weapons.
Or, you need to be up and above the field of battle. People who are working on these issues hear tones and hums.
If you hear persistent tones and static; have body vibrations, burning sensations, "bangs" to the head, neurological damage, or immune system damage; are hearing electronic voices or hearing the sound of a plasma; suffering from pains deep in your organs or constant headaches; or experiencing other anomalous activity then you may be being targeted by directed energy, mind control weapons. These weapons could be on helicopters, jets, stealth fighters, or on satellites.
Directed energy beams and electromagnetic waves can be sent to you via hand-held devices or piggy-backed in on cell phone and satellite towers.
Is it possible that someone(s) are very afraid of coming famines and riots due to the ongoing, man-induced failure of the ecological system, and they are saturating the earth with chemtrails for large- scale, gas plasma mind control?
Is this the last grasp for the world's resources? Or, are they just control freaks and money mongers?
Someone would like to get to that oil under the melting [due to chemtrail-trapped EM heat] Artic. And, I guess the Third World is not a part of this system.
I don't think that the developed nations are going to let them in on this either.
Any country that joins this NATO system will become mind-controlled and diseased due to the associated, intense, oscillating, electromagnetic fields, electromagnetic soup, and the poisonous, toxic chemtrails. Our DNA will break.
We risk the earth's spin and tilt becoming messed up due to mucking around with the magnetic fields through this military technology. Maybe, it is already messed up.
It constitutes U.S. global domination via NATO and the erosion of civil rights. According to Charlotte Iserbyt and Al Martin, there are ex-KGB and ex-STASI advising our new Office of Total Information Awareness.
They are the ones creating our new internal passports [national ID]. And under "The Treaty on Open Skies," we have overflights by Russian and German military.
Who exactly is flying those plasma-cloaked craft that are seen all over this country and mistaken for UFOs by people who do not know about this aerial deception technology?
Obviously, we have another "Project Paperclip" in the making. We can add the new thugs to the 2,000 Iraqi brought into country by Daddy Bush who are now living in Nebraska.
The elitist corporate government is going to hold the rest of us hostage with directed energy weapons in space, if the Policy for a New American Century group - PNAC - Bush and cronie think tank has their way, along with directed energy attacks against any country or citizen that they decide they do not like.
These weapons can create climate war, weather war, mind war, cyber war, disease war, disaster war, and undetectable war.
Taken together they can create economic war. If this system is not stopped, it will kill billions due to aluminum and barium poisoning. It will kill billions due to crop failures and world-wide famine. It will cause heart attacks, strokes, and cancers. It will cause stillbirths, miscarriages, and infertility.
The chemtrail sprays often have fungi, bacteria, viruses, dessicated red blood cells, crystalline substances, carbon, metal cations, lithium, other chemicals, heavy metals, and God knows what - probably smart dust, or nanocrap.
Years of biowarfare testing on the American public is no big secret anymore.
Spraying germs in the sky where they mutate due to the ultra-violet light -- brillant plan, my man. Are we acceptable losses or is this by design? I know that many of the major players have big investments in pharmaceutical companies, GM seeds [seeds that can grow in an electromagnetic soup], weapons and directed energy development contracts, oil contracts, genetic research, and mind control research. Some of these people have had a familial history of financial and policy support for population control, eugenics, Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Lenin, Marx, Pinochet, Hussein, and various other dictators. Some of the major players were the masterminds of the death squads in Central and South America. They stand to make a big profit on our death and disease. Just take a look at Rumsfield and Tamiflu. I assume that they know the dangers of this system and that they take care to stay in their shielded, air-filtered offices, homes, bases, and cars. I assume they take chelating substances to remove the barium and aluminum from their bodies and minds. If not, then they really do not understand the far-ranging implications of this destructive system. Congress may not understand just what a terrible weapons system and control grid they are funding. As I understand it, Tesla towers attached to deep-earth, free-energy taps are to be created over the 10-12 magnetic poles and the GWEN system phased-out. Has this already been done? This should allow total control of the earth through giant, Tesla death ray-guns.
This natural, electromagnetic earth was not meant to be an un-natural dynamo to power man's weapons or his utility companies. Over-unity systems [Tesla devices]* are as of yet, another unexplored and probably not understood man-made energy. We should be very suspect of free energy.
As you can see, the forms of man-made energy that have been created and used in the past have not been good for this planet. Maybe it is time to reconsider the options available to us through the development of crops for fuel, wind, solar, and water power. We need world-wide, different, more holistic, renewable, energy programs. Is there any good news? Yes. There has been tons of particulate dumping through the spray operations for 8 years over the Americas, Europe, Scandinavia, Eastern Europe, and from what I can find out, over Russia. And, what goes around blows around, right? So, these substances are probably actually global. It sure makes a ton of sense to spray poisonous elements in 24 NATO countries and let the substances be carried around the earth on the jet streams to poison yourself, your enemies, and all neutral and non-combatent countries. Talk about making more enemies. The water, air, and soil of all of these countries is so saturated with metal cations that these weapons freaks should be able to zap and mind f--k each other quite well now and as often as they wish. Once they have clobbered each other with light-saber beams for a few years and razed and scorched sections of the earth, they may start to realize that this foreign policy will lead to a defective human race and a rotten economy.....
FINALLY... a serious article about chemtrails in a major city newspaper....
A quote from the Las Vegas Tribune Chemtrail article by Marcus K. Dalton:
"Especially disturbing for residents of heavily chemtrailed communities like Las Vegas is a "chemtrail sickness" associated with heavy spray days leaving many stricken people complaining of the "flu" and acute allergic reactions months after the flu season has ended.
Upper and lower respiratory and gastrointestinal ailments remain unusually high in many spray areas, along with debilitating fatigue - and something even more worrying.
What's going on?
He is convinced that we are under "deliberate biological attack" by agents known only to top military and government officials responsible for permitting continuing over-flights by unmarked spray aircraft."
Earth's atmosphere full of chemtrails and chem-haze, clearly visible in this recent sat image....
I wrote to the senate many times asking why they spray chemtrails and they respond back in denial ..that its only condensation ... They clearly lie about this ...why??
Tuesday, December 24, 2013
Religion of peace?
"Islam is a religion of peace". Or is it? This is what our politically correct politicians keep telling us. But what is politically correct is not necessarily correct. The truth is that Islam is not a religion of peace. It is a religion of hate, of terror and of war.
A thorough study of Quran and Hadith reveal an Islam that is not being presented honestly by the Muslim propagandists and is not known to the majority of Muslims. Islam as it is taught in Quran (Koran) and lived by Muhammad, as is reported in the Hadith (Biography and sayings of the Prophet) is a religion of intolerance, inequality, violence, discrimination, superstition, fanaticism, and blind faith.
Islam advocates killing the non-Muslims, abuses the human rights of the minorities and women. Islam expanded by Jihad (holy war) and forced its way by killing the non-believers and the dissidents.
Muhammad lived a less than holy life.
His lust for sex, his affairs with his maids and slave girls, his pedophilic relationship with Aisha a 9-year-old child at the age of 53, his killing sprees, his massacre and the genocide of the Jews, his slave making and trading, his assassination of his opponents, his raids and lootings of the merchant caravans, his burning of the palm plantations, his destroying the water wells, his cursing and invoking evil on his enemies and his revenge on his captured prisoners of war disqualify him as a decent human being let alone the messenger of God
An unbiased study of Quran shows that far from being a “miracle” that book is a hoax.
Once Quran is scrutinized with rational thinking, almost every sentence proves to be false.
Quran is replete with scientific heresies, historic blunders, mathematical mistakes, logical absurdities and grammatical errors.
Could possibly the author of this Universe be as ignorant as it appears to be in Quran?
Quran tells Muslims to kill the disbelievers wherever they find them (Q. 2:191), to murder them and treat them harshly (Q. 9:123), slay them (Q. 9:5), fight with them, (Q. 8: 65 ) even if they are Christians and Jews, humiliate them and impose on them a penalty tax (Q. 9: 29). Quran takes away the freedom of belief from all humanity and tell clearly that no other religion except Islam is accepted (Q. 3: 85). It relegates those who disbelieve in Quran to hell (Q. 5:10), calls them najis (filthy, untouchable, impure) (Q. 9: 28). It orders its followers to fight the unbelievers until no other religion except Islam is left (Q. 2: 193). It says that the non-believers will go to hell and will drink boiling water (Q. 14: 17).
It asks the Muslims to slay or crucify or cut the hands and feet of the unbelievers, that they be expelled from the land with disgrace and that “they shall have a great punishment in world hereafter” (Q.5: 34). “As for the disbelievers”, it says that “for them garments of fire shall be cut and there shall be poured over their heads boiling water whereby whatever is in their bowls and skin shall be dissolved and they will be punished with hooked iron rods” (Q. 22: 9).
Quran prohibits a Muslim to befriend a non-believer even if that non-believer is the father or the brother of that Muslim (Q. 9: 23), (Q. 3: 28). Quran asks the Muslims to “strive against the unbelievers with great endeavor (Q. 25: 52), be stern with them because they belong to hell (Q. 66: 9). The holy Prophet demanded his follower to “strike off the heads of the disbelievers”; then after making a “wide slaughter among them, carefully tie up the remaining captives” (Q. 47: 4). As for women the book of Allah says that they are inferior to men and their husbands have the right to scourge them if they are found disobedient (Q. 4:34).
It teaches that women will go to hell if they are disobedient to their husbands (Q. 66:10). It maintains that men have an advantage over the women (Q. 2:228). It not only denies the women's equal right to their inheritance (Q. 4:11-12), it also regards them as imbeciles and decrees that their witness is not admissible in the court (Q. 2:282).
This means that a woman who is raped cannot accuse her rapist unless she can produce a male witness. Muhammad allowed the Muslims to marry up to four wives and gave them license to sleep with their slave maids and as many “captive” women as they may have (Q. 4:3). He himself did just that. This is why anytime a Muslim army subdues another nation, they call them kafir and allow themselves to rape their women. Pakistani soldiers raped up to 250,000 Bangali women in 1971 after they massacred 3,000,000 unarmed civilians when their religious leader decreed that Bangladeshis are unislamic.
This is why the prison guards in Islamic regime of Iran rape the women and then kill them after calling them apostates and the enemies of Allah.
Quran says Earth is flat or the stars are missiles that Allah fires at the genies who climb the heaven to eavesdrop the conversation of the exalted assembly. These tales could even amuse us. Islam must go because it teaches hate, it orders killing the non-Muslims, it denigrates women and it violates the human rights.
Islam must go not because it is false but because it is destructive, because it is a danger; a threat to peace and security of humankind. With the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction in Islamic countries, Islam has become a serious and a real threat to the survival of our civilization............
A thorough study of Quran and Hadith reveal an Islam that is not being presented honestly by the Muslim propagandists and is not known to the majority of Muslims. Islam as it is taught in Quran (Koran) and lived by Muhammad, as is reported in the Hadith (Biography and sayings of the Prophet) is a religion of intolerance, inequality, violence, discrimination, superstition, fanaticism, and blind faith.
Islam advocates killing the non-Muslims, abuses the human rights of the minorities and women. Islam expanded by Jihad (holy war) and forced its way by killing the non-believers and the dissidents.
Muhammad lived a less than holy life.
His lust for sex, his affairs with his maids and slave girls, his pedophilic relationship with Aisha a 9-year-old child at the age of 53, his killing sprees, his massacre and the genocide of the Jews, his slave making and trading, his assassination of his opponents, his raids and lootings of the merchant caravans, his burning of the palm plantations, his destroying the water wells, his cursing and invoking evil on his enemies and his revenge on his captured prisoners of war disqualify him as a decent human being let alone the messenger of God
An unbiased study of Quran shows that far from being a “miracle” that book is a hoax.
Once Quran is scrutinized with rational thinking, almost every sentence proves to be false.
Quran is replete with scientific heresies, historic blunders, mathematical mistakes, logical absurdities and grammatical errors.
Could possibly the author of this Universe be as ignorant as it appears to be in Quran?
Quran tells Muslims to kill the disbelievers wherever they find them (Q. 2:191), to murder them and treat them harshly (Q. 9:123), slay them (Q. 9:5), fight with them, (Q. 8: 65 ) even if they are Christians and Jews, humiliate them and impose on them a penalty tax (Q. 9: 29). Quran takes away the freedom of belief from all humanity and tell clearly that no other religion except Islam is accepted (Q. 3: 85). It relegates those who disbelieve in Quran to hell (Q. 5:10), calls them najis (filthy, untouchable, impure) (Q. 9: 28). It orders its followers to fight the unbelievers until no other religion except Islam is left (Q. 2: 193). It says that the non-believers will go to hell and will drink boiling water (Q. 14: 17).
It asks the Muslims to slay or crucify or cut the hands and feet of the unbelievers, that they be expelled from the land with disgrace and that “they shall have a great punishment in world hereafter” (Q.5: 34). “As for the disbelievers”, it says that “for them garments of fire shall be cut and there shall be poured over their heads boiling water whereby whatever is in their bowls and skin shall be dissolved and they will be punished with hooked iron rods” (Q. 22: 9).
Quran prohibits a Muslim to befriend a non-believer even if that non-believer is the father or the brother of that Muslim (Q. 9: 23), (Q. 3: 28). Quran asks the Muslims to “strive against the unbelievers with great endeavor (Q. 25: 52), be stern with them because they belong to hell (Q. 66: 9). The holy Prophet demanded his follower to “strike off the heads of the disbelievers”; then after making a “wide slaughter among them, carefully tie up the remaining captives” (Q. 47: 4). As for women the book of Allah says that they are inferior to men and their husbands have the right to scourge them if they are found disobedient (Q. 4:34).
It teaches that women will go to hell if they are disobedient to their husbands (Q. 66:10). It maintains that men have an advantage over the women (Q. 2:228). It not only denies the women's equal right to their inheritance (Q. 4:11-12), it also regards them as imbeciles and decrees that their witness is not admissible in the court (Q. 2:282).
This means that a woman who is raped cannot accuse her rapist unless she can produce a male witness. Muhammad allowed the Muslims to marry up to four wives and gave them license to sleep with their slave maids and as many “captive” women as they may have (Q. 4:3). He himself did just that. This is why anytime a Muslim army subdues another nation, they call them kafir and allow themselves to rape their women. Pakistani soldiers raped up to 250,000 Bangali women in 1971 after they massacred 3,000,000 unarmed civilians when their religious leader decreed that Bangladeshis are unislamic.
This is why the prison guards in Islamic regime of Iran rape the women and then kill them after calling them apostates and the enemies of Allah.
Quran says Earth is flat or the stars are missiles that Allah fires at the genies who climb the heaven to eavesdrop the conversation of the exalted assembly. These tales could even amuse us. Islam must go because it teaches hate, it orders killing the non-Muslims, it denigrates women and it violates the human rights.
Islam must go not because it is false but because it is destructive, because it is a danger; a threat to peace and security of humankind. With the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction in Islamic countries, Islam has become a serious and a real threat to the survival of our civilization............
Friday, December 20, 2013
Bum fight
Two producers of a "Bumfights" video of homeless people fighting and performing dangerous stunts were jailed in 2005 for failing to perform required community service work....
They made millions filming homeless people fight ..or have them remove a tooth with a tong or tattoo bumfight on their forehead or just do stupid stuff like the jackass movies and ofcause here in Vegas .. I met him once ...on a party ..he smoked weed and was all promoting his videos ... buy this and that ..now its all up for public ...dunno what happened to the guy but I knew he fled Vegas to go to texas for felony warrant ...
Anyhow his videos is hilarious and u laugh ur ass of watching bum fights ...they r just people on drugs or alcohol and they do anything for money ...
I love the bum fights but at the same a moral question comes in though..at the same time this is the raw reality ...
watch one of em if u want ....
it is funny but not funny too ...
They made millions filming homeless people fight ..or have them remove a tooth with a tong or tattoo bumfight on their forehead or just do stupid stuff like the jackass movies and ofcause here in Vegas .. I met him once ...on a party ..he smoked weed and was all promoting his videos ... buy this and that ..now its all up for public ...dunno what happened to the guy but I knew he fled Vegas to go to texas for felony warrant ...
Anyhow his videos is hilarious and u laugh ur ass of watching bum fights ...they r just people on drugs or alcohol and they do anything for money ...
I love the bum fights but at the same a moral question comes in though..at the same time this is the raw reality ...
watch one of em if u want ....
it is funny but not funny too ...
People do anything for money lol
sad to say ....
Superglue on the toilet seat
Seriously ...this woman enters Home depot and need to go to the restroom ...so she sits down and cant get up....
Is this a viscous crime or a prank??? If so... if that would've been me... I would beat the shit of that person if I found out ...
So heres the story ..
She goes to home depot ...goes to the restroom shes superglued to the toilet for like 20 min until someone looks for her ..then they use WD40 to free her while ppl film and watch here in the restroom were its done ...they don't take her to the hospital and I cannot even imagen the embarrassment of that situation ...
Her skin disappeared apparently and need to heal and hopefully she will sue the shit out of Home depot ... watch the video and the story here :
http://www.whio.com/news/news/weird-news/video-shows-woman-glued-home-depot-toilet-seat/ncGPY/?icmp=cmgcontent_internallink_relatedcontent_2013_morepopularheadlines2
There were men in there ..guys on break and others checking in to film on phone cams ...how freakin embarrassing ..
Is this a viscous crime or a prank??? If so... if that would've been me... I would beat the shit of that person if I found out ...
So heres the story ..
She goes to home depot ...goes to the restroom shes superglued to the toilet for like 20 min until someone looks for her ..then they use WD40 to free her while ppl film and watch here in the restroom were its done ...they don't take her to the hospital and I cannot even imagen the embarrassment of that situation ...
Her skin disappeared apparently and need to heal and hopefully she will sue the shit out of Home depot ... watch the video and the story here :
http://www.whio.com/news/news/weird-news/video-shows-woman-glued-home-depot-toilet-seat/ncGPY/?icmp=cmgcontent_internallink_relatedcontent_2013_morepopularheadlines2
There were men in there ..guys on break and others checking in to film on phone cams ...how freakin embarrassing ..
I hope they catch the little bastard that did this ...regardless this woman will be rich suing the home depot ..
Wednesday, December 18, 2013
People are weird and bizarre
A bizarre case of weirdness happened in the city of Londrina, state of Paraná, Brazil....
A man inserted into his anus a live fish known locally as Piramboia.
English name for these eel like fish is the South American Lungfish....
The fish pulled itself into the ass getting all cozy.... that the perverted guy had no choice but to have it surgically removed .
The staff from the Hospital Universitário (University Hospital) in Londrina filmed the surgery and posted the video on the internet, immortalizing his sexual deviancy gone bad.
The lungfish, which embedded itself inside the patient’s bowels, was still alive after removal, but had to be killed.
A man inserted into his anus a live fish known locally as Piramboia.
English name for these eel like fish is the South American Lungfish....
The fish pulled itself into the ass getting all cozy.... that the perverted guy had no choice but to have it surgically removed .
The staff from the Hospital Universitário (University Hospital) in Londrina filmed the surgery and posted the video on the internet, immortalizing his sexual deviancy gone bad.
The lungfish, which embedded itself inside the patient’s bowels, was still alive after removal, but had to be killed.
read about it and watch the video :
The Second Amendment
The Second Ammendment SUCKS My friend told me earlier today when we discussed the gun law ... , he knows I have a Colt Python 357 magnum with 8 3/8ts inch barrel ,a taurus 357 magnum 2 inch barrel and a 12 gauge shotgun....
For all those people who didn’t pay attention in U.S History class,ore dont know ....this is the right to carry arms.
His argument was ass follows:
Even in light of all of the terrorism this country would be a whole lot safer if people didn’t have the right to carry guns....
I’ve been to countries he said where people don’t have the right to carry guns and people, its peace of mind knowing that the guy you pass on the street can blow you away if he feels like it. (Im from Sweden so I know too)
Statistics he says .....show that you are much MUCH more likely to shoot one of your own FAMILY MEMBERS than the burglar or murderer that you fear..... he say’s it’s something like 8 in 10 chances that you shoot someone you love rather than the criminal..... so why bother having a gun if you are only going to hurt the people you are trying to protect?
That amendment was written back when there were no police to protect the civilians, so you were pretty much on your own to provide protection for your family. last time i checked, every city, town, village, whatever has its own police force........
*NOW TO ME THAT IS A BUNCH OF BULL*
First of all, if guns are outlawed only the criminals will have guns............ When a criminal has the fear that I’m gonna pull a gun and blow his brains out, he will think twice. ............
To better illustrate this, look at the UK and Australia who have restricted gun ownership greatly. What has happened?: An increase in violent crime, more “kick-in” burglaries, and an overall feeling of insecurity.......
Why should we punish over 99% of people who use guns correctly? Outlawing firearms has proved itself futile.....
2’nd nobody can blow you away if they feel like it because then thats murder one....
That person is then observed by all the other people around and then that guy is basicly target practice for the cops. I think your reletivly safe, not everyone owns guns and they are ususally used to keep burglers out. ........
And I love to go target shooting .......
let’s remember this though...i would rather have a gun and not need it, than need it and not have it!
More gun laws won’t do anything except help criminals.
They don’t get their guns thru legal means, so the only ones gun laws hurt are law abiding citizens. Responsible gun owners know how to secure their guns and ammo and are smart enough to teach their children about gun safety.
There are more people killed in automobile accidents every year than with firearms ... then we should outlaw cars too.......
Also, many people use guns legally; for hunting and sport shooting.
I can stab people in the eye with a fork, but doesnt mean i am going to. Why outlaw forks? it’s be stupid.............
What people cannot seem to understand is that guns are INANIMATE objects.
They have no want, need, or desire to do harm.
It is the will, and the ignorance, of man that is responsible for the deaths and injuries that are caused by guns.
The gun is a tool, same as a car, whip, baseball bat or feather duster. It is not the object that is bad ... it is the *twit* pulling the trigger.
What do you think??Do you like your freedom? all the many things you can do as an american?Well i do, and the right to carry a gun is only one of the many freedoms i enjoy....
The right to carry guns is not the root af all our criminal problems!
even if the second amendment was excluded.... crime, and terrorism would still happen...people still would be strangled...still be stabbed with knifes .....still make bombs.....
According to Federal statistics, something like 2,000,000 crimes are prevented or stopped each year by private citizens and their guns.
If you think back on mass shootings in our history, just remember that one law-abiding citizen in those public venues carrying a weapon could have put an early end to those rampages.
MYTH: “Mass shootings by crazy ‘gunmen’ are a serious threat to society, and a cause to worry for everyone.”
FACT: Mass shootings where psychopaths shoot total strangers are actually rare, and only account for about 60 to 90 total deaths per year.
Considering that the population of the U.S. is about 260 million, your chances of dying in one of these shootings are extremely small.
If you include disgruntled employees shooting co-workers, then the total increases to about 200 per year; (still an extremely small risk). . (Sources: Libernet Press, & Boston Globe.)
Also, these shootings would all have had very different results if JUST ONE of those victims had been allowed to carry a gun for self defense. Many lives could have been SAVED.
First of all, making firearms illegal doesn’t take guns out of criminals hands... do you think they get them legally now?
Banning guns, is just a step toward restrictions.
It’s a small step exactly where Big Brother wants you to go. It’s naiive to think that getting rid of guns will erase crime - people are criminals, a gun is just a tool.
I don’t know what to tell ya, if you don’t like guns ..dont get one......
and more..... It is the constitutional rights of the AMERICAN citizens!
I see the negative point in it too ....as i come from sweden....but crimes wont dissapear if gun dissapear....It would rather bennefit criminals........
Again I say that accident will always happen
but responsible gun owners know how to secure their guns and ammo and are smart enough to teach their children about gun safety....
FACT are: These statistics on “child” gun deaths are exaggerated by including young adult criminals, often up to 18, and sometimes up to 24 years old......
So these “child gun death” statistics include young adult drug dealers killing each other in turf battles.
The deaths are not nearly as tragic as a truly innocent young child being killed, (which is what most people think of when you say “child gun deaths”. Any other use of that phrase is very misleading.
The truth is, the number of American kids aged 0 to 15 killed with guns is about 950 each year.....
Guns are involved in less than half of one percent of all child deaths!
Also, the “gun death” statistics quoted by the anti self defense lobby include all deaths from guns.
So they include gun deaths that are actually justified; as when a citizen or officer shoots a criminal who is trying to rob, rape or murder................
Finally, the anti-gun “statistics” always fail to mention the many times guns are used to prevent crime and save lives.
(Sources for those who wants to check it out : National Center for Health Statistics, Advanced Data From Vital and Health Statistics, No. 231. New England Journal of Medicine Vol. 270: page2207)
For all those people who didn’t pay attention in U.S History class,ore dont know ....this is the right to carry arms.
His argument was ass follows:
Even in light of all of the terrorism this country would be a whole lot safer if people didn’t have the right to carry guns....
I’ve been to countries he said where people don’t have the right to carry guns and people, its peace of mind knowing that the guy you pass on the street can blow you away if he feels like it. (Im from Sweden so I know too)
Statistics he says .....show that you are much MUCH more likely to shoot one of your own FAMILY MEMBERS than the burglar or murderer that you fear..... he say’s it’s something like 8 in 10 chances that you shoot someone you love rather than the criminal..... so why bother having a gun if you are only going to hurt the people you are trying to protect?
That amendment was written back when there were no police to protect the civilians, so you were pretty much on your own to provide protection for your family. last time i checked, every city, town, village, whatever has its own police force........
*NOW TO ME THAT IS A BUNCH OF BULL*
First of all, if guns are outlawed only the criminals will have guns............ When a criminal has the fear that I’m gonna pull a gun and blow his brains out, he will think twice. ............
To better illustrate this, look at the UK and Australia who have restricted gun ownership greatly. What has happened?: An increase in violent crime, more “kick-in” burglaries, and an overall feeling of insecurity.......
Why should we punish over 99% of people who use guns correctly? Outlawing firearms has proved itself futile.....
2’nd nobody can blow you away if they feel like it because then thats murder one....
That person is then observed by all the other people around and then that guy is basicly target practice for the cops. I think your reletivly safe, not everyone owns guns and they are ususally used to keep burglers out. ........
And I love to go target shooting .......
let’s remember this though...i would rather have a gun and not need it, than need it and not have it!
More gun laws won’t do anything except help criminals.
They don’t get their guns thru legal means, so the only ones gun laws hurt are law abiding citizens. Responsible gun owners know how to secure their guns and ammo and are smart enough to teach their children about gun safety.
There are more people killed in automobile accidents every year than with firearms ... then we should outlaw cars too.......
Also, many people use guns legally; for hunting and sport shooting.
I can stab people in the eye with a fork, but doesnt mean i am going to. Why outlaw forks? it’s be stupid.............
What people cannot seem to understand is that guns are INANIMATE objects.
They have no want, need, or desire to do harm.
It is the will, and the ignorance, of man that is responsible for the deaths and injuries that are caused by guns.
The gun is a tool, same as a car, whip, baseball bat or feather duster. It is not the object that is bad ... it is the *twit* pulling the trigger.
What do you think??Do you like your freedom? all the many things you can do as an american?Well i do, and the right to carry a gun is only one of the many freedoms i enjoy....
The right to carry guns is not the root af all our criminal problems!
even if the second amendment was excluded.... crime, and terrorism would still happen...people still would be strangled...still be stabbed with knifes .....still make bombs.....
According to Federal statistics, something like 2,000,000 crimes are prevented or stopped each year by private citizens and their guns.
If you think back on mass shootings in our history, just remember that one law-abiding citizen in those public venues carrying a weapon could have put an early end to those rampages.
MYTH: “Mass shootings by crazy ‘gunmen’ are a serious threat to society, and a cause to worry for everyone.”
FACT: Mass shootings where psychopaths shoot total strangers are actually rare, and only account for about 60 to 90 total deaths per year.
Considering that the population of the U.S. is about 260 million, your chances of dying in one of these shootings are extremely small.
If you include disgruntled employees shooting co-workers, then the total increases to about 200 per year; (still an extremely small risk). . (Sources: Libernet Press, & Boston Globe.)
Also, these shootings would all have had very different results if JUST ONE of those victims had been allowed to carry a gun for self defense. Many lives could have been SAVED.
First of all, making firearms illegal doesn’t take guns out of criminals hands... do you think they get them legally now?
Banning guns, is just a step toward restrictions.
It’s a small step exactly where Big Brother wants you to go. It’s naiive to think that getting rid of guns will erase crime - people are criminals, a gun is just a tool.
I don’t know what to tell ya, if you don’t like guns ..dont get one......
and more..... It is the constitutional rights of the AMERICAN citizens!
I see the negative point in it too ....as i come from sweden....but crimes wont dissapear if gun dissapear....It would rather bennefit criminals........
Again I say that accident will always happen
but responsible gun owners know how to secure their guns and ammo and are smart enough to teach their children about gun safety....
FACT are: These statistics on “child” gun deaths are exaggerated by including young adult criminals, often up to 18, and sometimes up to 24 years old......
So these “child gun death” statistics include young adult drug dealers killing each other in turf battles.
The deaths are not nearly as tragic as a truly innocent young child being killed, (which is what most people think of when you say “child gun deaths”. Any other use of that phrase is very misleading.
The truth is, the number of American kids aged 0 to 15 killed with guns is about 950 each year.....
Guns are involved in less than half of one percent of all child deaths!
Also, the “gun death” statistics quoted by the anti self defense lobby include all deaths from guns.
So they include gun deaths that are actually justified; as when a citizen or officer shoots a criminal who is trying to rob, rape or murder................
Finally, the anti-gun “statistics” always fail to mention the many times guns are used to prevent crime and save lives.
(Sources for those who wants to check it out : National Center for Health Statistics, Advanced Data From Vital and Health Statistics, No. 231. New England Journal of Medicine Vol. 270: page2207)
The secrets of math
Math has a big influence in our daily lives, but people don’t realize that.....
For instance, the development of the computers was initiated in the USA by mathematicians, that continue to give an important contribution to the theory of the computer science.....
So the basic maths of life proves that Attitude is the secret....
Do you ever wonder about those people who say they are giving more than 100%
We have all been to those meetings.... where someone wants over 100%
So how about achieving 103%???
What makes life 100%????
Here's a little math that might prove useful......
If
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
is represented as
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Then ....H A R D W O R K
8 18 4 23 15 18 11 = 98%
and ...K N O W L E D G E
11 14 15 23 12 5 4 7 5 = 96%
but.... A T T I T U D E
1 20 20 9 20 21 4 5 = 100%
and ....B U L L S H I T
2 21 12 12 19 8 9 20 = 103%
So it stands to reason that hard work and knowledge will get you close.... attitude will get you there but bullshit will put you over the top......
And look how far this will get you.....
A S S K I S S I N G
1 19 19 11 9 19 19 14 7 = 118%
Then we have sleeping with the boss ;-)
19,12,5,5,16,9,14,7 , 23,9,20,8, 20,8 ,5 ,2,15 ,19,19
S ,L E, E ,P ,I, N,G, W ,I ,T ,H T,H,E B,O , S , S
and that my dear is 235 %
For instance, the development of the computers was initiated in the USA by mathematicians, that continue to give an important contribution to the theory of the computer science.....
So the basic maths of life proves that Attitude is the secret....
Do you ever wonder about those people who say they are giving more than 100%
We have all been to those meetings.... where someone wants over 100%
So how about achieving 103%???
What makes life 100%????
Here's a little math that might prove useful......
If
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
is represented as
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Then ....H A R D W O R K
8 18 4 23 15 18 11 = 98%
and ...K N O W L E D G E
11 14 15 23 12 5 4 7 5 = 96%
but.... A T T I T U D E
1 20 20 9 20 21 4 5 = 100%
and ....B U L L S H I T
2 21 12 12 19 8 9 20 = 103%
So it stands to reason that hard work and knowledge will get you close.... attitude will get you there but bullshit will put you over the top......
And look how far this will get you.....
A S S K I S S I N G
1 19 19 11 9 19 19 14 7 = 118%
Then we have sleeping with the boss ;-)
19,12,5,5,16,9,14,7 , 23,9,20,8, 20,8 ,5 ,2,15 ,19,19
S ,L E, E ,P ,I, N,G, W ,I ,T ,H T,H,E B,O , S , S
and that my dear is 235 %
Tuesday, December 17, 2013
Feeding the world...or corrupt goverments?
I was solicited on the phone the other day to donate money to help feed hungry children in Africa and other parts of the world. So I asked a few questions (Remember... question EVERYTHING).
I said “It seems like we’ve been feeding hungry children for a long time now. Is anybody doing anyhting to try and stop this cycle of having children you can’t feed.... like.. oh, I don’t know.... maybe giving them BIRTH CONTROL!” And his answer was... “That would be against our religious teachings.”
I said “You fuckin MORON!” and hung up. ANYONE who can’t afford to care for a child should not have the privelege (yes, I said privelege) of having one...
If you take money from the state or a charity to support your family, then birth control should be MANDATORY.
I seriously dont give money to charity for the sole perpose that it doesnt go to were it is needed most of the time....
For ex...Redcross went out and wanted people to donate money for the 9-11 victims....many millions was donated....when it was time toi pay up...they said that they are keeping the money for future catostrafies.....and people got furious.....so red cross said...those who have donated can have their money back....
To donate money like for ex.Sweden and other country ...the list goes as follow ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_governments_by_development_aid
I said “It seems like we’ve been feeding hungry children for a long time now. Is anybody doing anyhting to try and stop this cycle of having children you can’t feed.... like.. oh, I don’t know.... maybe giving them BIRTH CONTROL!” And his answer was... “That would be against our religious teachings.”
I said “You fuckin MORON!” and hung up. ANYONE who can’t afford to care for a child should not have the privelege (yes, I said privelege) of having one...
If you take money from the state or a charity to support your family, then birth control should be MANDATORY.
I seriously dont give money to charity for the sole perpose that it doesnt go to were it is needed most of the time....
For ex...Redcross went out and wanted people to donate money for the 9-11 victims....many millions was donated....when it was time toi pay up...they said that they are keeping the money for future catostrafies.....and people got furious.....so red cross said...those who have donated can have their money back....
To donate money like for ex.Sweden and other country ...the list goes as follow ...
United States – $30.46 billion
United Kingdom – $13.66 billion
Germany – $13.11 billion
France – $12.00 billion
Japan – $10.49 billion
Canada – $5.68 billion
Netherlands – $5.52 billion
Australia – $5.44 billion
Sweden – $5.24 billion
Norway – $4.75 billion
Switzerland – $3.02 billion
Denmark – $2.72 billion
Italy – $2.64 billion
Belgium – $2.30 billion
Spain – $1.95 billion
South Korea – $1.55 billion
Finland – $1.32 billion
Austria – $1.11 billion
Ireland – $0.81 billion
Portugal – $0.57 billion
New Zealand – $0.46 billion
Luxembourg – $0.43 billion
Greece – $0.32 billion
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_governments_by_development_aid
what to do about islam if i was in power
Most of what I would do is already being done by the government of Denmark:
1.) End immigration from Muslim countries.
2.) Enact laws such as were done in Denmark to eliminate the abuse of family reunification laws. These laws apply to everyone BTW, not just Muslims.
3.) Deport illegal aliens, as well as any legal aliens who have committed a crime. (Again, applies to everyone, not just Muslims.)
4.) End welfare payments and encourage work.
5.) Try to encourage disbursement of immigrants into the population at large rather than allow them to ghettize. This will aid assimilation.
6.) Refuse any kind of special pleading or special exemptions for Muslims that go against the secular nature of our society. For instance, companies and public buildings should not be forced to build prayer rooms for Muslims (or for anyone else, for that matter.)
7.) Absolutely stand up for our Western values such as freedom of speech and freedom of expression. Again, Denmark is the exemplar in Anders Fogh Rasmussen's response to the Muslim ambassadors who tried to twist his arm over the matter of the mildly insulting Danish cartoons published in a newspaper.
8.) End the poisonous multi-culti, PC and Western-self-loathing ideology that is continually pumped into our societies by academia, the media, NGOs and "intellectuals".
We are told constantly by our elites that we live in the worst civilization in the world, when in fact we live in the best one (and that includes the best one for minorities too...
Absolutely refuse to give an inch on any value we hold dear, no matter how "insulting" it is to our Islamic brothers.
9. Encourage Muslims to convert to other religions by supporting missionary activities.
10. Stop trying to stifle the debate about how Islam is affecting our communities. Covering up evidence of Muslim wrong-doing in our communities, such as the government covering up rapes in Sweden or the refusal of the French media to report how many cars have been "car-bequed", for fear of causing "racism," only makes matters worse.
11. End the nonsense of "celebrating our differences", diversity coordinators, and all the other bullshit that has been shoved down our throats by the leftist cultural warriors for years. It hasn't accomplished a multi-culti paradise; it's done exactly the opposite, making people more suspicious of other ethnic groups and more resentful of them. We should be celebrating our samenesses, not our differences. I despise Måna Salin with passion ..she is a trator to our country ...
12. Realize that Islam is a political system as well as a religion, and treat it as such when it makes political demands on our societies.
I don't support banning mosques or Islamic books, but I do support very strongly banning any type of special favor or special pleading for Muslims just because they have so many, many special demands and needs and accommodations. For us to give them their "complete way of life" means that WE don't get to have OUR complete way of life.
1.) End immigration from Muslim countries.
2.) Enact laws such as were done in Denmark to eliminate the abuse of family reunification laws. These laws apply to everyone BTW, not just Muslims.
3.) Deport illegal aliens, as well as any legal aliens who have committed a crime. (Again, applies to everyone, not just Muslims.)
4.) End welfare payments and encourage work.
5.) Try to encourage disbursement of immigrants into the population at large rather than allow them to ghettize. This will aid assimilation.
6.) Refuse any kind of special pleading or special exemptions for Muslims that go against the secular nature of our society. For instance, companies and public buildings should not be forced to build prayer rooms for Muslims (or for anyone else, for that matter.)
7.) Absolutely stand up for our Western values such as freedom of speech and freedom of expression. Again, Denmark is the exemplar in Anders Fogh Rasmussen's response to the Muslim ambassadors who tried to twist his arm over the matter of the mildly insulting Danish cartoons published in a newspaper.
8.) End the poisonous multi-culti, PC and Western-self-loathing ideology that is continually pumped into our societies by academia, the media, NGOs and "intellectuals".
We are told constantly by our elites that we live in the worst civilization in the world, when in fact we live in the best one (and that includes the best one for minorities too...
Absolutely refuse to give an inch on any value we hold dear, no matter how "insulting" it is to our Islamic brothers.
9. Encourage Muslims to convert to other religions by supporting missionary activities.
10. Stop trying to stifle the debate about how Islam is affecting our communities. Covering up evidence of Muslim wrong-doing in our communities, such as the government covering up rapes in Sweden or the refusal of the French media to report how many cars have been "car-bequed", for fear of causing "racism," only makes matters worse.
11. End the nonsense of "celebrating our differences", diversity coordinators, and all the other bullshit that has been shoved down our throats by the leftist cultural warriors for years. It hasn't accomplished a multi-culti paradise; it's done exactly the opposite, making people more suspicious of other ethnic groups and more resentful of them. We should be celebrating our samenesses, not our differences. I despise Måna Salin with passion ..she is a trator to our country ...
12. Realize that Islam is a political system as well as a religion, and treat it as such when it makes political demands on our societies.
I don't support banning mosques or Islamic books, but I do support very strongly banning any type of special favor or special pleading for Muslims just because they have so many, many special demands and needs and accommodations. For us to give them their "complete way of life" means that WE don't get to have OUR complete way of life.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)